Gluth v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan

548 F. App'x 73
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2013·No. 20-1743·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nora Gluth (Gluth) brought this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., challenging the termination of her long-term disability benefits under the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan (the Plan). On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court, applying a de *74 novo standard of review, granted summary-judgment in favor of the Plan. In the present appeal, Gluth challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Plan.

Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the district court’s memorandum opinion, and the applicable law, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gluth v. The Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-1126, 2013 WL 246897 (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gluth v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan, 548 F. App'x 73 (4th Cir. 2013).

548 F. App'x 73 (Gluth v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pike v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
368 F. Supp. 3d 1018 (E.D. Texas, 2019)
Weisner v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston
192 F. Supp. 3d 601 (D. Maryland, 2016)