Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.
This text of 135 A. 917 (Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vice-Chancellor Berry, who heard this case in the court of chancery, advised a decree dismissing the complainants’ bill of complaint.
Our reading of the record leads us to the same conclusion as that of the learned vice-chancellor. We agree with the findings of fact as made by the vice-chancellor. We also agree with his application of the legal principles.
The decree of the court of chancery dismissing the complainants’ bill is therefore affirmed and the decree is in all other respects affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisoit, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hbteield, JJ. IS.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A. 917, 100 N.J. Eq. 554, 15 Stock. 554, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gluck-v-rynda-development-co-nj-1927.