Gluck v. Pickel
This text of 286 A.D. 1071 (Gluck v. Pickel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The order should be modified to strike paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 of the complaint, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellants and, as so modified, affirmed, with leave to respondent to replead. It is not apparent that the allegations of those paragraphs are relevant to the cause of action stated and they are at most evidentiary. They should, therefore, be stricken under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, although upon the trial the matter contained therein may become material and relevant to establish respondent’s cause of action and be admitted into evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D. 1071, 145 N.Y.S.2d 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gluck-v-pickel-nyappdiv-1955.