Gluck v. Peter Freund Knitting Mills

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gluck v. Peter Freund Knitting Mills

198 A.2d 768, 42 N.J. 60, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 184

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 17, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 A.2d 768 (Gluck v. Peter Freund Knitting Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gluck v. Peter Freund Knitting Mills, 198 A.2d 768, 42 N.J. 60, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Curiam.

The Workmen’s Compensation Division applied the death dependency rates which were in force at the time of the decedent’s death. On appeal the County Court took the position that the rates in force at the time of the accident in 1954 rather than the death in 1958 were controlling. N. J. S. A. 34:15-13. The petitioner appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified before argument there. Under the holding in McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., Town of Kearny, 79 N. J. Super. 249 (App. Div. 1963), aff’d 41 N. J. 117 (1964), the County Court’s position was erroneous. Its judgment is therefore set aside and the award as rendered in the Workmen’s Compensation Division is reinstated.

Reversed.

For reversal •— Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Sciiettino and Haneman — 7.

For affirmance — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Curiam.

The Workmen’s Compensation Division applied the death dependency rates which were in force at the time of the decedent’s death. On appeal the County Court took the position that the rates in force at the time of the accident in 1954 rather than the death in 1958 were controlling. N. J. S. A. 34:15-13. The petitioner appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified before argument there. Under the holding in McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., Town of Kearny, 79 N. J. Super. 249 (App. Div. 1963), aff’d 41 N. J. 117 (1964), the County Court’s position was erroneous. Its judgment is therefore set aside and the award as rendered in the Workmen’s Compensation Division is reinstated.

Reversed.

For reversal •— Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Sciiettino and Haneman — 7.

For affirmance — Hone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.2d 768, 42 N.J. 60, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gluck-v-peter-freund-knitting-mills-nj-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack