Gluck v. Eastern Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gluck v. Eastern Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

271 A.D.2d 532, 706 N.Y.S.2d 354, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 532 (Gluck v. Eastern Analytical Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gluck v. Eastern Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 271 A.D.2d 532, 706 N.Y.S.2d 354, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), entered August 12, 1999, which granted the respondents’ motion, in effect, to vacate a judgment of the same court entered June 8, 1999, upon confirmation of the arbitration award, to the extent of directing a rehearing before the American Arbitration Association.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the respondents’ motion. The respondents were served with a demand for arbitration and were notified of the hearing date, but chose not to appear. The arbitrator made an express finding that the respondents were properly served with the arbitration demand. The respondents failed to establish that the award was [533]*533procured through fraud or misconduct or any of the other statutorily-defined grounds for vacatur of an arbitration award (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; Matter of Motors Ins. Corp. [Lewis], 221 AD2d 634; Imgest Fin. Establishment v Shearson Lehman Hutton, 172 AD2d 291). Krausman, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), entered August 12, 1999, which granted the respondents’ motion, in effect, to vacate a judgment of the same court entered June 8, 1999, upon confirmation of the arbitration award, to the extent of directing a rehearing before the American Arbitration Association.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the respondents’ motion. The respondents were served with a demand for arbitration and were notified of the hearing date, but chose not to appear. The arbitrator made an express finding that the respondents were properly served with the arbitration demand. The respondents failed to establish that the award was [533]*533procured through fraud or misconduct or any of the other statutorily-defined grounds for vacatur of an arbitration award (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; Matter of Motors Ins. Corp. [Lewis], 221 AD2d 634; Imgest Fin. Establishment v Shearson Lehman Hutton, 172 AD2d 291). Krausman, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 532, 706 N.Y.S.2d 354, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gluck-v-eastern-analytical-laboratories-inc-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack