Glubka v. Teegarden

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Glubka v. Teegarden

279 N.W. 567, 202 Minn. 594

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 6, 1938·No. No. 31,574.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves injuries resulting from the same accident involved in Hoge v. Teegarden, 202 Minn. 592, 279 N. W. 401, decided herewith. The only question is the question of damages, which counsel for the appellant stated upon the oral argument were not excessive as reduced by the trial court.

The order denying a new trial is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stone, because of illness, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case involves injuries resulting from the same accident involved in Hoge v. Teegarden, 202 Minn. 592, 279 N. W. 401, decided herewith. The only question is the question of damages, which counsel for the appellant stated upon the oral argument were not excessive as reduced by the trial court.

The order denying a new trial is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stone, because of illness, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Glubka v. Teegarden, 279 N.W. 567, 202 Minn. 594 (Mich. 1938).

Pincite

279 N.W. 567 (Glubka v. Teegarden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related