Glubka v. Teegarden

279 N.W. 567, 202 Minn. 594
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 6, 1938
DocketNo. 31,574.
StatusPublished

This text of 279 N.W. 567 (Glubka v. Teegarden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glubka v. Teegarden, 279 N.W. 567, 202 Minn. 594 (Mich. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves injuries resulting from the same accident involved in Hoge v. Teegarden, 202 Minn. 592, 279 N. W. 401, decided herewith. The only question is the question of damages, which counsel for the appellant stated upon the oral argument were not excessive as reduced by the trial court.

The order denying a new trial is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stone, because of illness, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoge v. Teegarden
279 N.W. 401 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 N.W. 567, 202 Minn. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glubka-v-teegarden-minn-1938.