Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co.

48 S.E. 355, 120 Ga. 983, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 767

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 12, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 S.E. 355 (Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co., 48 S.E. 355, 120 Ga. 983, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 767 (Ga. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Candler, J.

This case is identical in principle with those of Henry v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 9, Beasley v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 13, and High v. Padrosa, 119 Ga. 648. Neither of the cases cited was decided hy a full hench, hut each of them is approved as announcing correct principles of law. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Napier & Gox and J. T. Wright, for plaintiff. Slaton & Phillips, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Candler, J.

This case is identical in principle with those of Henry v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 9, Beasley v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 13, and High v. Padrosa, 119 Ga. 648. Neither of the cases cited was decided hy a full hench, hut each of them is approved as announcing correct principles of law. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Napier & Gox and J. T. Wright, for plaintiff. Slaton & Phillips, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 S.E. 355, 120 Ga. 983, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glower-v-glidden-varnish-co-ga-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack