Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co.

48 S.E. 355, 120 Ga. 983, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 767

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 12, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Candler, J.

This case is identical in principle with those of Henry v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 9, Beasley v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 13, and High v. Padrosa, 119 Ga. 648. Neither of the cases cited was decided hy a full hench, hut each of them is approved as announcing correct principles of law. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Napier & Gox and J. T. Wright, for plaintiff. Slaton & Phillips, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Candler, J.

This case is identical in principle with those of Henry v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 9, Beasley v. Lennox-Haldeman Co., 116 Ga. 13, and High v. Padrosa, 119 Ga. 648. Neither of the cases cited was decided hy a full hench, hut each of them is approved as announcing correct principles of law. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Napier & Gox and J. T. Wright, for plaintiff. Slaton & Phillips, for defendant.

Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co., 48 S.E. 355, 120 Ga. 983, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 767 (Ga. 1904).

Pincite

48 S.E. 355 (Glower v. Glidden Varnish Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related