Glow-Brite Electrical Service Corp. v. Frocol Restaurant Corp.
This text of 56 A.D.2d 909 (Glow-Brite Electrical Service Corp. v. Frocol Restaurant Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover the balance due on an oral contract to supply certain labor, services and materials, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 14, 1976, which is in favor of plaintiff and against it, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Trial Term’s decision is adequately supported by the record. Any objections which defendant might have interposed to the introduction of plaintiff’s evidence were waived by its failure to make such objections at the trial. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant an adjournment of the trial after the case had been set down peremptorily. Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 909, 392 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glow-brite-electrical-service-corp-v-frocol-restaurant-corp-nyappdiv-1977.