Glover v. Vail Corporation
This text of 137 F.3d 1444 (Glover v. Vail Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michelle GLOVER, a natural person and citizen of the United
Kingdom, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VAIL CORPORATION, doing business as Vail Associates, Inc., a
Colorado corporation; Vail Associates, Inc., a Colorado
corporation; Vail Associates Holdings, Ltd., a Colorado
corporation; Vail Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-1100.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
April 13, 1998.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Of Colorado (D.Ct. No. 96-B-394).
Michael J. Roche (John B. Moorhead with him on briefs), of Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David H. Yun (Stephen Hopkins with him on brief), of Long & Jaudon, P.C., Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before TACHA, McKAY, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
We AFFIRM the holding of the district court for substantially the same reasons discussed by the district court in its published opinion. See Glover v. Vail Corp., 955 F.Supp. 105 (D.Colo.1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 F.3d 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-vail-corporation-ca10-1998.