Glover v. State

78 So. 769, 117 Miss. 792
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1918·Published

Opinion

Sykes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant, Tom Glover, was indicted and convicted in the circuit court of Forrest county of the •crime of seduction. From the judgment of that court 'this appeal is prosecuted.

[795] Without stating the facts in the case, it is sufficient to say that the testimony of the prosecutrix as to her previous chaste character, the promise of marriage of her by the. defendant, and the act of seduction were in no way corroborated by any other testimony in the case. Section 1372 of the Code of 1906 (section 1108, Hemingway’s Code). Long v. State, 100 Miss. 7, 56 So. 185, Lewis v. State, 111 Miss. 833, 72 So. 241, Ferguson v. State, 71 Miss. 805, 15 So. 66, 42 Am. St. Rep. 492, and Carter v. State, 99 Miss. 206, 54 So. 805, have all held that this testimony .of the prosecutrix must be otherwise corrobated.

The' judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the prisoner discharged.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glover v. State, 78 So. 769, 117 Miss. 792 (Mich. 1918).

78 So. 769 (Glover v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. State
71 Miss. 805 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1894)
Carter v. State
54 So. 805 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)
Long v. State
56 So. 185 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)
Lewis v. State
72 So. 241 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)