Glover v. State

933 So. 2d 692, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12056, 2006 WL 2032499
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2006·No. No. 5D06-1100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Michael E. Glover’s motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Absent prejudice or manifest injustice, which has not been shown to exist here, an imperfect plea colloquy does not create reversible error. See Freber v. State, 638 So.2d 140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Williams v. State, 534 So.2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glover v. State, 933 So. 2d 692, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12056, 2006 WL 2032499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

933 So. 2d 692 (Glover v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McAdory v. State
933 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)