Glover v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glover v. State

642 So. 2d 846, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9333, 1994 WL 525504

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 29, 1994

DocketNo. 93-4041

StatusPublished

This text of 642 So. 2d 846 (Glover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glover v. State, 642 So. 2d 846, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9333, 1994 WL 525504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s restitution order as to both appellants. See, e.g., Nix v. State, 604 So.2d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). However, we remand with directions that the written restitution order be corrected to conform to the court’s oral pronouncements — as [847]*847to appellant Glover, that restitution payments were to commence on November 10, 1993, and thereafter to continue on the tenth day of each succeeding month; and, as to appellant Williams, that restitution payments are to commence two months after he is either placed in a work-release program or released from incarceration into the probation program.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s restitution order as to both appellants. See, e.g., Nix v. State, 604 So.2d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). However, we remand with directions that the written restitution order be corrected to conform to the court’s oral pronouncements — as [847]*847to appellant Glover, that restitution payments were to commence on November 10, 1993, and thereafter to continue on the tenth day of each succeeding month; and, as to appellant Williams, that restitution payments are to commence two months after he is either placed in a work-release program or released from incarceration into the probation program.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 So. 2d 846, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9333, 1994 WL 525504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack