Glover v. State

203 So. 2d 676
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 1967
DocketNo. 1145
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 203 So. 2d 676 (Glover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glover v. State, 203 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The basic evidence of the defendant’s guilt stems from a confession obtained from him while in custody, after being arrested on suspicion of the crime for which he was convicted. The confession was obtained before Miranda v. State of Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, but the trial was subsequent. It clearly appears that the exactions of Miranda were not met and that the defendant’s rights were prejudiced thereby. The judgment appealed from is reversed and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith on remand.

Reversed.

WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. State
266 So. 2d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Ard v. State
233 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Woods v. State
211 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Mitchell v. State
203 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.