Glover v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Glover v. State

615 So. 2d 1331, 1993 WL 35254

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 12, 1993

DocketCR-92-0123

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 615 So. 2d 1331 (Glover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glover v. State, 615 So. 2d 1331, 1993 WL 35254 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Randall Dejuan Glover appeals the denial of his petition, which is styled as a "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus." A review of the petition reveals that the allegations raised therein should be entertained in a proceeding under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. This court has consistently held that when a post-conviction petition styled as a petition for writ of habeas corpus is filed and the allegations raised in the petition are cognizable in a proceeding under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P., the cause should be entertained in the court of original conviction and the petitioner should be given the opportunity to file a petition in the proper form as required by Rule 32.6(a). Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992) (and cases cited therein). Therefore, this case is remanded to the circuit court with directions that the petition be returned to the appellant so that he can have the opportunity to file a proper Rule 32 petition.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randall Dejuan Glover appeals the denial of his petition, which is styled as a "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus." A review of the petition reveals that the allegations raised therein should be entertained in a proceeding under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. This court has consistently held that when a post-conviction petition styled as a petition for writ of habeas corpus is filed and the allegations raised in the petition are cognizable in a proceeding under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P., the cause should be entertained in the court of original conviction and the petitioner should be given the opportunity to file a petition in the proper form as required by Rule 32.6(a). Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992) (and cases cited therein). Therefore, this case is remanded to the circuit court with directions that the petition be returned to the appellant so that he can have the opportunity to file a proper Rule 32 petition.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 So. 2d 1331, 1993 WL 35254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-state-alacrimapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack