Glover v. Ostenfeld

Missouri Court of Appeals

Glover v. Ostenfeld

895 S.W.2d 673, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 1995 WL 142332

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 1995·No. No. 65753·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Ostenfeld (Ostenfeld), Public Administrator for the City of St. Louis, appeals from a judgment entitling Rita D. Glover (Rita) to the proceeds of the life insurance policy on her husband William held by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and she appeals the denial of her claims for vexatious delay, attorney fees and costs. Rita’s motions to dismiss Ostenfeld’s appeal and for sanctions are denied.

An extended opinion would not have prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Ostenfeld (Ostenfeld), Public Administrator for the City of St. Louis, appeals from a judgment entitling Rita D. Glover (Rita) to the proceeds of the life insurance policy on her husband William held by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and she appeals the denial of her claims for vexatious delay, attorney fees and costs. Rita’s motions to dismiss Ostenfeld’s appeal and for sanctions are denied.

An extended opinion would not have prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Glover v. Ostenfeld, 895 S.W.2d 673, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 676, 1995 WL 142332 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 673 (Glover v. Ostenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.