Glover v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glover v. New York City Transit Authority

278 A.D.2d 450, 717 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13935

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 26, 2000·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the infant plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 18, 2000, which directed her to submit to a physical examination.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the infant plaintiff to submit to a physical examination (see, Law v City of New York, 250 AD2d 540; Fitzgerald v Avidon, 222 AD2d 335; Dominguez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 168 AD2d 376; Williams v Long [451]*451Is. Coll. Hosp., 147 AD2d 558). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the infant plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 18, 2000, which directed her to submit to a physical examination.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the infant plaintiff to submit to a physical examination (see, Law v City of New York, 250 AD2d 540; Fitzgerald v Avidon, 222 AD2d 335; Dominguez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 168 AD2d 376; Williams v Long [451]*451Is. Coll. Hosp., 147 AD2d 558). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Glover v. New York City Transit Authority, 278 A.D.2d 450, 717 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

278 A.D.2d 450 (Glover v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related