Glover v. Hynes Lumber Co.

69 N.W. 62, 94 Wis. 457, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 176
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 1896·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

WiNslow, J.

It is evident that the jury had no testimony before them from which they could determine how much of the plaintiff’s time and labor were spent in manufacturing the lumber in question. At best it could be but a mere guess. The statute gives a lien only for the labor and services performed in manufacturing the lumber. It is plainly the plaintiff’s duty to show the amount of such labor and services. Until he does so, he is in no position to demand a lien. He cannot leave it for the jury to speculate upon, without evidence. There must be a new trial.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glover v. Hynes Lumber Co., 69 N.W. 62, 94 Wis. 457, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 176 (Wis. 1896).

69 N.W. 62 (Glover v. Hynes Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boone v. P & B LOGGING COMPANY
397 P.2d 31 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1964)
Hughes v. Hughes
164 N.W. 435 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1917)
McGeorge v. Stanton-De Long Lumber Co.
110 N.W. 788 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Carpenter v. McCord Lumber Co.
83 N.W. 764 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
Glover v. Hynes Lumber Co.
77 N.W. 1119 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
De Morris v. Wilbur Lumber Co.
74 N.W. 105 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
Kendall v. Hynes Lumber Co.
71 N.W. 1039 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)