Glover v. Hodges

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 15, 2005·No. 04-7640·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7640

TEKOA T. GLOVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIM HODGES, Governor of South Carolina; MARK SANFORD, Governor of the State of South Carolina; DRUANNE WHITE, Solicitor of the Tenth Circuit; GENE TAYLOR, Sheriff of Anderson County; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-03-2151)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tekoa T. Glover, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Tekoa T. Glover appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glover v.

Hodges, No. CA-03-2151 (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glover v. Hodges, (4th Cir. 2005).

Glover v. Hodges (Glover v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related