Glover v. Glover
This text of 221 So. 3d 687 (Glover v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the dismissal of appellant’s complaint against appellee, as the action was barred by the statute of limitations. § 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2014). None of the issues appellant raises have merit. We dismiss the appeal as to attorneys’ fees, as the trial court has not set the amount of the award. The fee order is therefore non-final and nonappealable, and this Court lacks jurisdiction presently to review it. See Greenberg v. Greenberg, 129 So.3d 470, 471 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Ritter v. Ritter, 690 So.2d 1372, 1376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 So. 3d 687, 2017 WL 2814886, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-glover-fladistctapp-2017.