Glover v. Cohen

District Court, D. South Carolina·Decided January 30, 2025·No. 4:24-cv-02635·Unknown

Opinion

GSES DSR O/ ips. a Sa a HS Rorsp IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION DAVID GLOVER, § Petitioner, § § vs. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:24-2635-MGL § WARDEN LAVERN COHEN, § Respondent. § ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING THE PETITION WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING Petitioner David Glover (Glover) filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition (the petition) against Respondent Warden Lavern Cohen (Cohen). Glover is representing himself. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting Cohen’s motion for summary judgment be granted in its entirety, and the petition be dismissed without an evidentiary hearing. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on January 6, 2025, but Glover failed to file any objections to the Report. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. It is therefore the judgment of this Court Cohen’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in its entirety, and the petition is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing. To the extent Glover asks for a certificate of appealability, such request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 29th day of January 29th, 2024, in Columbia, South Carolina. /s/ Mary Geiger Lewis MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

***** NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Glover is hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glover v. Cohen, (D.S.C. 2025).

Glover v. Cohen (Glover v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related