Glover v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth.

827 S.E.2d 104
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 9, 2019·No. No. 356P18·Published

Opinion

R. Kent Brown, Jon Ryan Moore, Paige L. Pahlke, Charlotte, John R. Taylor, Robert E. Zaytoun, Matthew D. Ballew, Raleigh, Attorneys at Law, For Glover, Briana Washington, et al.

John H. Beyer, Katherine H. Graham, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, et al.

Daniel N. Mullins, Attorney at Law, Durham

William Conor Brockett, Associate General Counsel

Phillip T. Jackson, Attorney at Law, Asheville, For N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 29th of October 2018 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Ervin and Davis, J. recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glover v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth., 827 S.E.2d 104 (N.C. 2019).

827 S.E.2d 104 (Glover v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.