Glover v. Baltimore & O. R.

Third Circuit

Glover v. Baltimore & O. R.

158 F.2d 157

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 22, 1946

DocketNos. 9168, 9171

StatusPublished

This text of 158 F.2d 157 (Glover v. Baltimore & O. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glover v. Baltimore & O. R., 158 F.2d 157 (3d Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These two appeals were presented together and were tried together in the District Court. They involve claims on behalf of persons suffering property damage in a collision between a Baltimore & Ohio Railroad train and a loaded trailer truck which was crossing the track. The Trial Judge submitted the case to the jury and it found for the plaintiffs. We have considered the facts and agree with the District Court that the case was one to be submitted to the jury and that there is sufficient factual basis to support its finding. The appellant raises one point about the sufficiency of the proof as to damage. We are satisfied that here, too, proof was sufficient to take the case to the jury.

The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These two appeals were presented together and were tried together in the District Court. They involve claims on behalf of persons suffering property damage in a collision between a Baltimore & Ohio Railroad train and a loaded trailer truck which was crossing the track. The Trial Judge submitted the case to the jury and it found for the plaintiffs. We have considered the facts and agree with the District Court that the case was one to be submitted to the jury and that there is sufficient factual basis to support its finding. The appellant raises one point about the sufficiency of the proof as to damage. We are satisfied that here, too, proof was sufficient to take the case to the jury.

The judgments are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 F.2d 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-baltimore-o-r-ca3-1946.