Glover v. Admr. of Ott

12 S.C.L. 572
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 S.C.L. 572 (Glover v. Admr. of Ott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glover v. Admr. of Ott, 12 S.C.L. 572 (S.C. 1822).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Huger

delivered the opinion of the court.

What are necessaries for an infant, is a question of law for the decision of the court. How much, and of what quality the necessaries should be, must depend upon hi a pecuniary circumstances, and of these, the jury are the judges.

Lodging, clothing, food, medicine and education, are, necessaries to every infant. Such articles, therefore, as come under these heads, must be allowed. The others, such as liquor, pistols, powder, saddles, bridles, whips, fiddles, fiddle-strings, &c. amounting to $111 53 1-2, ought not to have been allowed.' A new trial must' therefore be granted, unless the plaintiff shall remit so much of the verdict.

Justices Nott, Richardson and Colcock, concurred. Felder, for the motion. Glover, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Reed
2025 Ohio 4708 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
Joshua McCoy v. ATF
Fourth Circuit, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 S.C.L. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-v-admr-of-ott-sc-1822.