Glover, M., Pet v. Udren Law Offices
108 A.3d 28, 630 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 48
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 13, 2015
Docket334 WAL 2014 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 108 A.3d 28 (Glover, M., Pet v. Udren Law Offices) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glover, M., Pet v. Udren Law Offices, 108 A.3d 28, 630 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 48 (Pa. 2015).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:
(1) Does Act 6, § 502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute establishes, against any statutorily defined “person” collecting statutorily prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?
The Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Glover, M. v. Udren Law Offices
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Glover, M., Aplt. v. Udren Law Offices
139 A.3d 195 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Generation Mortg. Co. v. Bung Thi Nguyen
138 A.3d 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 A.3d 28, 630 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glover-m-pet-v-udren-law-offices-pa-2015.