Glotzer v. Glotzer
This text of 281 A.D. 979 (Glotzer v. Glotzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a separation action, order, insofar as it grants respondent’s motion to punish appellant for contempt in failing to comply with the judgment, and denies appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment as having heen entered by consent contrary to rule 283 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. It is hereby found that appellant abandoned and failed to support respondent. Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur; Rolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny respondent’s motion and to grant appellant’s motion. [See post, p. 1030.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 979, 121 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glotzer-v-glotzer-nyappdiv-1953.