Glotzback v. Foster

California Supreme Court

Glotzback v. Foster

11 Cal. 37

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cal. 37 (Glotzback v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glotzback v. Foster, 11 Cal. 37 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field J., concurring.

It is not necessary to examine the errors assigned in this case, for the reason that it appears from the record that after service of the notice of appeal the parties filed a stipulation, in which it was agreed that defendant should be credited on the execution, in the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars, and that all errors in the “ record, referee’s report, decree and judgment,” were waived.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field J., concurring.

It is not necessary to examine the errors assigned in this case, for the reason that it appears from the record that after service of the notice of appeal the parties filed a stipulation, in which it was agreed that defendant should be credited on the execution, in the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars, and that all errors in the “ record, referee’s report, decree and judgment,” were waived.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cal. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glotzback-v-foster-cal-1858.