Gloth v. Brusco Equities, LLC, Inc.
This text of 1 A.D.2d 294 (Gloth v. Brusco Equities, LLC, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J), entered January 2, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There is no evidence that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition that caused plaintiff’s injury (see Juarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 NY2d 628, 646 [1996]). The court properly disregarded plaintiffs affidavit on the issue of notice since it contradicted his prior deposition testimony and was clearly tailored to create an issue of fact (Phillips v Bronx Lebanon Hosp., 268 AD2d 318, 320 [2000]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 294, 767 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1 A.D.3d 294, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloth-v-brusco-equities-llc-inc-nyappdiv-2003.