Glos v. Sanitary District of Chicago
This text of 79 N.E. 562 (Glos v. Sanitary District of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
: This court has no jurisdiction to review the decree rendered in this cause. Plaintiff in error evidently procured the writ to issue from this court instead of from the Appellate Court in the belief that a freehold was involved. That belief, however, is a mistaken one. A freehold is not involved. Gage v. Busse, 94 Ill. 590; Kronenberger v. Heinemann, 190 id. 17; Johnson v. McDonald, 196 id. 394; First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Gibson, 221 id. 295.
The writ of error will be dismissed.
Writ dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.E. 562, 224 Ill. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glos-v-sanitary-district-of-chicago-ill-1906.