Glos v. City of Chicago
226 U.S. 599, 33 S. Ct. 112, 57 L. Ed. 375, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2165
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline, 199 U. S. 593; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164, 172; Tracy v. Ginsberg, 205 U. S. 170, 177-178; King v. West Virginia, 216 U. S. 92, 101; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glos v. City of Chicago, 226 U.S. 599, 33 S. Ct. 112, 57 L. Ed. 375, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2165 (1912).
226 U.S. 599 (Glos v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fairfax Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte County v. Kansas City, Mo.
27 F.2d 613 (D. Kansas, 1928)
Morgan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
225 P. 1029 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)
Glos v. O'Connell
231 U.S. 740 (Supreme Court, 1913)