Gloria Werth Steven Werth Michael Werth v. Joseph H. Tashof Wilda P. Tashof
This text of 829 F.2d 37 (Gloria Werth Steven Werth Michael Werth v. Joseph H. Tashof Wilda P. Tashof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
829 F.2d 37
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gloria WERTH; Steven Werth; Michael Werth, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Joseph H. TASHOF; Wilda P. Tashof, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-1021
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 24, 1987
Decided September 2, 1987
Michael W. Werth, for appellants.
Richard Harold Gins, Gins & Seebar, PC, for appellees.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon review of the record and the district court's opinion finding the challenged transfers voidable and finding the related debts dischargeable in bankruptcy, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Werth v. Tashof, C/A No. 85-2664-H, C/A No. 86-2152, (D. Md., Dec. 10, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
829 F.2d 37, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11665, 1987 WL 44682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloria-werth-steven-werth-michael-werth-v-joseph-h-ca4-1987.