Gloria Valerio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Catherine Culp, Manager

Court of Appeals of Texas

Gloria Valerio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Catherine Culp, Manager

DecidedSeptember 9, 1998

Docket04-98-00120-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Gloria Valerio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Catherine Culp, Manager (Gloria Valerio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Catherine Culp, Manager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gloria Valerio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Catherine Culp, Manager, (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

No. 04-98-00120-CV

Gloria VALERIO, Appellant

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC. and Catherine Culp, Manager, Appellee

From the 79^th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 94-11-33142-CV Honorable Edward G. Aparicio, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 9, 1998

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief, which was due June 19, 1998, has not been filed. On July 24, 1998, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. This appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No. 04-98-00120-CV

Gloria VALERIO, Appellant

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC. and Catherine Culp, Manager, Appellee

From the 79^th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 94-11-33142-CV Honorable Edward G. Aparicio, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 9, 1998

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief, which was due June 19, 1998, has not been filed. On July 24, 1998, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. This appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gloria Valerio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Catherine Culp, Manager, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloria-valerio-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-and-catherine-texapp-1998.