Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2013
Docket13-12-00772-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority (Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00772-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

GLORIA PEREZ, Appellant,

v.

BEEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law of Bee County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Gloria Perez, appeals the trial court’s judgment of eviction entered

against appellant in a forcible detainer suit. On January 25, 2012, appellee filed a motion

to dismiss the appeal as moot, stating that appellant has voluntarily vacated the subject

property.

“The only issue in an action for forcible detainer is the right to actual possession of the premises, and the merits of title shall not be adjudicated.” Wilhelm v. Fannie Mae,

349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (citing Tex. R. Civ.

P. 746; Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex.

2006)). Although the failure to supersede a forcible-detainer judgment does not divest a

defendant of his right to appeal when the defendant is no longer in possession of the

premises, an appeal from the judgment in that case is moot unless the defendant asserts

a “potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession.” Marshall, 198

S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768.

The Clerk of the Court requested a response from appellant. Appellant has

responded that she has vacated the apartment and it is ready for inspection. Absent any

assertion of a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession, we

GRANT appellee’s motion and DISMISS the appeal as moot. See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d

at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 14th day of February, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Housing Authority of San Antonio
198 S.W.3d 782 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloria-perez-v-beeville-housing-authority-texapp-2013.