Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority
This text of Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority (Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00772-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
GLORIA PEREZ, Appellant,
v.
BEEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law of Bee County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Gloria Perez, appeals the trial court’s judgment of eviction entered
against appellant in a forcible detainer suit. On January 25, 2012, appellee filed a motion
to dismiss the appeal as moot, stating that appellant has voluntarily vacated the subject
property.
“The only issue in an action for forcible detainer is the right to actual possession of the premises, and the merits of title shall not be adjudicated.” Wilhelm v. Fannie Mae,
349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (citing Tex. R. Civ.
P. 746; Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex.
2006)). Although the failure to supersede a forcible-detainer judgment does not divest a
defendant of his right to appeal when the defendant is no longer in possession of the
premises, an appeal from the judgment in that case is moot unless the defendant asserts
a “potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession.” Marshall, 198
S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768.
The Clerk of the Court requested a response from appellant. Appellant has
responded that she has vacated the apartment and it is ready for inspection. Absent any
assertion of a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession, we
GRANT appellee’s motion and DISMISS the appeal as moot. See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d
at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 14th day of February, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gloria Perez v. Beeville Housing Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloria-perez-v-beeville-housing-authority-texapp-2013.