Gloria Ochoa v. Nail Flower Beauty Salon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 2015·No. 04-14-00509-CV·Published

Opinion

Nail Flower Beauty /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2015

No. 04-14-00509-CV

Gloria OCHOA,

Appellant

v.

NAIL FLOWER BEAUTY SALON, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-CI-12691 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a third motion for extension of time to file her brief, asking for an additional sixty days to file her brief. We previously granted her two prior extensions for a total of seventy-four days, making her brief due January 30, 2015. We have reviewed appellant’s motion. Based on our review, we GRANT appellant’s motion in part and DENY it in part. We GRANT appellant’s request for a third extension, but we DENY appellant’s request for an additional sixty days to file her brief. We GRANT appellant an additional sixteen days to file her brief and we ORDER her to file her appellant’s brief in this court on or before February 16, 2015. We advise appellant that NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT WRITTEN PROOF OF EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. We recognize appellant is pro se; however, pro se parties are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and are expected to comply with all rules and procedures applicable to appeals.

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of January, 2015.

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gloria Ochoa v. Nail Flower Beauty Salon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Gloria Ochoa v. Nail Flower Beauty Salon (Gloria Ochoa v. Nail Flower Beauty Salon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.