Gloria Elizabeth Romero-Perez v. State
This text of Gloria Elizabeth Romero-Perez v. State (Gloria Elizabeth Romero-Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-20-00573-CR
Gloria Elizabeth Romero-Perez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2016-659, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Gloria Elizabeth Romero-Perez has filed a notice of appeal from her
judgment of conviction for the offense of continuous trafficking of a person. The State has filed
a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that Romero-Perez’s notice of appeal was untimely.
In criminal cases, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day
sentence is imposed in open court or within 90 days after the day sentence is imposed in open
court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). In this case,
Romero-Perez’s sentence was imposed in open court on February 5, 2019, and she timely filed a
motion for new trial. Thus, her notice of appeal was due on or before May 6, 2019. Romero-
Perez did not file her notice of appeal until November 30, 2020.
Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this
appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1996). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction and dismiss as moot
the State’s motion.1
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 17, 2020
Do Not Publish
1 The remedy for a late-filed notice of appeal is to file a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07; Ex parte Johnson, 12 S.W.3d 472, 473 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 374–75 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gloria Elizabeth Romero-Perez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloria-elizabeth-romero-perez-v-state-texapp-2020.