Glore v. George B.

4 Neb. 131
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 4 Neb. 131 (Glore v. George B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glore v. George B., 4 Neb. 131 (Neb. 1875).

Opinion

Lake, Ch. J.

The statute now governing appeals to this court was passed March 3,1873, and section one of the act provides as follows:

“That in all actions in equity either party may appeal from the judgment or decree rendered, or final order made by the district court, to the supreme court of the State. The party appealing shall, xxithin six months after the date of the rendition of the decree * * * * procure from the cleric of the district [132]*132court, and file m the office of the cleric of the supreme court, a certified transcript of the proceedings had in the district court, containing, etc., * * * and have the same properly docketed in the supreme court. And onfadlwre thereof the judgment or decree rendered * * * * shall stand and be proceeded in as if no appeal had been taken.”

For some purposes the whole term of court is considered as one day, no matter what time the act is done. We are however, of the opinion that the word “date” in this statute has reference to the day when the decree is actually rendered. In this case the decree was rendered Feb. 21, 1874, and transcript filed here August 22, 1874. Is this within the time prescribed by statute ? We think not. The rule of computation -is to exclude the first day, then count the full number of days or months to be computed. One month would terminate 21st day of March, and six months on the 21st day of August. This transcript is filed one day after, and is consequently too late. We can no more extend the time one day than six months. The law requires diligence. If the clerk below fails to make up the transcript in time, the appellant should appear here and suggest that fact. If he files transcript after the time prescribed, he cannot complain of negligence of the clerk.

Appear dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Morris v. Marsh
162 N.W.2d 262 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Williamsen
159 N.W.2d 206 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1968)
Application of Ruan Transport Corp. of Nebraska
79 N.W.2d 575 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1956)
Ray v. City of Wichita
27 P.2d 288 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1933)
Bank of El Paso v. Neal
27 S.W.2d 1024 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1930)
Johnston v. New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co.
125 N.W. 153 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1910)
Simmons v. Hanne
50 Fla. 267 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
Daly v. Concordia Fire Insurance
16 Colo. App. 349 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1901)
Renard v. Thomas
69 N.W. 932 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
McGinn v. State
65 N.W. 46 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Continental Building & Loan Ass'n v. Mills
62 N.W. 478 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Brown v. Williams
51 N.W. 851 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1892)
Chapman v. Allen
49 N.W. 926 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)
State Bank v. Green
8 Neb. 297 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Neb. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glore-v-george-b-neb-1875.