Gloekler v. Erie Restaurant Equipment Co.
This text of 63 F.2d 1004 (Gloekler v. Erie Restaurant Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the court below the trial judge held patents Nos. 1,610,944 and 1,748,123 were invalid, and that defendant did not infringe. After argument and full consideration, we fmd no error, and the decree will therefore be affirmed. The opinion of the trial judge (2 F. Supp. 844) is so thorough and comprehensive that a further one would he but a studied effort to put in different words what has been already thus fully discussed. We therefore limit ourselves to adopting his opinion and affirming the decree entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F.2d 1004, 16 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 332, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gloekler-v-erie-restaurant-equipment-co-ca3-1933.