Glod v. CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC.

766 N.W.2d 849
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 2009·No. 138393·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

766 N.W.2d 849 (2009)

Geraldine J. GLOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
DSI Industries, Inc., d/b/a Door Solutions, and Evangelical Homes of Michigan, d/b/a Pathways Transition Care, Defendants, and
Janet Young, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 138393. COA No. 279422.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glod v. CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC., 766 N.W.2d 849 (Mich. 2009).

766 N.W.2d 849 (Glod v. CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jasper
766 N.W.2d 849 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)