Glod v. CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC.
766 N.W.2d 849
This text of 766 N.W.2d 849 (Glod v. CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glod v. CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC., 766 N.W.2d 849 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Geraldine J. GLOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
DSI Industries, Inc., d/b/a Door Solutions, and Evangelical Homes of Michigan, d/b/a Pathways Transition Care, Defendants, and
Janet Young, Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Jasper
766 N.W.2d 849 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
766 N.W.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glod-v-clinton-river-cruise-company-inc-mich-2009.