Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Poolas
This text of 138 S.E. 336 (Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Poolas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The overruling of the special demurrers to the amended petition was not error.
2. Under .the facts of the case the finding of the jury, that the defendant’s refusal to pay the plaintiff’s claim was in bad faith, was not authorized. With this exception, the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial require another hearing of the case. If the plaintiff will write off from the verdict and judgment the sum of $133.20 (the amount found for damages and attorney’s fees), when the judgment of this court is made the judgment of the trial court, the judgment refusing the grant of a new trial will be affirmed; otherwise the judgment will stand reversed. The costs of bringing the writ of error to this court are taxed against the defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed, upon condition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 767, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-rutgers-fire-insurance-v-poolas-gactapp-1927.