Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Epstein

246 A.D. 586, 284 N.Y.S. 367

This text of 246 A.D. 586 (Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Epstein, 246 A.D. 586, 284 N.Y.S. 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Action for an injunction restraining defendants from issuing execution on a certain judgment entered in favor of defendants against plaintiff, and for a decree requiring defendants to specifically perform a written contract entered into with plaintiff. Orders granting plaintiff’s motion for temporary injunction, and denying defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint for insufficiency, and to strike out certain paragraphs of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 586, 284 N.Y.S. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-rutgers-fire-insurance-v-epstein-nyappdiv-1935.