Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Epstein
This text of 246 A.D. 586 (Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for an injunction restraining defendants from issuing execution on a certain judgment entered in favor of defendants against plaintiff, and for a decree requiring defendants to specifically perform a written contract entered into with plaintiff. Orders granting plaintiff’s motion for temporary injunction, and denying defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint for insufficiency, and to strike out certain paragraphs of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 586, 284 N.Y.S. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-rutgers-fire-insurance-v-epstein-nyappdiv-1935.