Globe Refining Co. v. Fort Gaines Oil & Guano Co.

37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 366, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 163
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 29, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. Where A and B entered into a contract whereby B agreed to deliver to A, at a specified time, a certain quantity of oil, and thereafter B sought an extension of time, but the parties did not agree upon the terms of the desired extension so as to make it binding upon both, and B still failed to deliver the oil, and A sued him for damages for not complying with the terms of the contract as the same would have been had the extension been actually agreed upon, A could not recover.

2. Alleged errors in the admission of evidence as to the amount of damages will not be considered in a case in which no damages at all can be recovered.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Globe Refining Co. v. Fort Gaines Oil & Guano Co., 37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 366, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 163 (Ga. 1900).

37 S.E. 379 (Globe Refining Co. v. Fort Gaines Oil & Guano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paulk v. Thomas
154 S.E.2d 872 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)