Globe Refining Co. v. Fort Gaines Oil & Guano Co.

37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 366, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 163
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 29, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 379 (Globe Refining Co. v. Fort Gaines Oil & Guano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Globe Refining Co. v. Fort Gaines Oil & Guano Co., 37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 366, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 163 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. Where A and B entered into a contract whereby B agreed to deliver to A, at a specified time, a certain quantity of oil, and thereafter B sought an extension of time, but the parties did not agree upon the terms of the desired extension so as to make it binding upon both, and B still failed to deliver the oil, and A sued him for damages for not complying with the terms of the contract as the same would have been had the extension been actually agreed upon, A could not recover.

2. Alleged errors in the admission of evidence as to the amount of damages will not be considered in a case in which no damages at all can be recovered.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paulk v. Thomas
154 S.E.2d 872 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 366, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-refining-co-v-fort-gaines-oil-guano-co-ga-1900.