Globe Printing Co. of St. Louis v. Cook
220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 717, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1711
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Kaufman v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116, and cases cited; Kansas City Star Com[604]*604pany v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, 590, and cases cited in last paragraph. Mr. Edward C. Crow and Mr. Hannis Taylor for the plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Globe Printing Co. of St. Louis v. Cook, 220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 717, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1711 (1911).
220 U.S. 603 (Globe Printing Co. of St. Louis v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian
215 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1909)
David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith
216 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1910)