Globe Printing Co. of St. Louis v. Cook
220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 717, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1711
This text of 220 U.S. 603 (Globe Printing Co. of St. Louis v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Globe Printing Co. of St. Louis v. Cook, 220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 717, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1711 (1911).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Kaufman v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116, and cases cited; Kansas City Star Com[604]*604pany v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, 590, and cases cited in last paragraph. Mr. Edward C. Crow and Mr. Hannis Taylor for the plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian
215 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1909)
David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith
216 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
220 U.S. 603, 31 S. Ct. 717, 55 L. Ed. 604, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-printing-co-of-st-louis-v-cook-scotus-1911.