Globe Indemnity Co. v. Roe
37 F. Supp. 761, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563
Opinion
I can find no warrant for the procedure of this motion. The writ of execution did not run to this district. 28 U. S. C.A. §§ 838, 839. Neither is the procedure authorized by Rule 69, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. If the judgment creditor desires to avail itself of the machinery here, it should sue on the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Roe, 37 F. Supp. 761, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563 (S.D.N.Y. 1941).
37 F. Supp. 761 (Globe Indemnity Co. v. Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Palmer
609 F. Supp. 544 (E.D. Tennessee, 1985)
United States v. Meredith
596 F.2d 1353 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
United States ex rel. Goldman v. Meredith
596 F.2d 1353 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
Rottenberg v. United States
142 F.2d 151 (Second Circuit, 1944)
United States v. Fairbank Realty Corp.
50 F. Supp. 373 (E.D. New York, 1943)