Globe Indemnity Co. v. Roe
37 F. Supp. 761, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563
This text of 37 F. Supp. 761 (Globe Indemnity Co. v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Roe, 37 F. Supp. 761, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563 (S.D.N.Y. 1941).
Opinion
I can find no warrant for the procedure of this motion. The writ of execution did not run to this district. 28 U. S. C.A. §§ 838, 839. Neither is the procedure authorized by Rule 69, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. If the judgment creditor desires to avail itself of the machinery here, it should sue on the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Palmer
609 F. Supp. 544 (E.D. Tennessee, 1985)
United States v. Meredith
596 F.2d 1353 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
United States ex rel. Goldman v. Meredith
596 F.2d 1353 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
Rottenberg v. United States
142 F.2d 151 (Second Circuit, 1944)
United States v. Fairbank Realty Corp.
50 F. Supp. 373 (E.D. New York, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 F. Supp. 761, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-indemnity-co-v-roe-nysd-1941.