Globe Importing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Globe Importing Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 837

United States Customs Court·Decided December 15, 1966·No. No. P66/372; No. P66/373·Published

Opinion

Kao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” and “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), except that the component material of chief value of the merchandise [838]*838in the items marked “C” is zinc, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” and “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), except that the component material of chief value of the merchandise [838]*838in the items marked “C” is zinc, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Globe Importing Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 837 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

57 Cust. Ct. 837 (Globe Importing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.