Globe Importing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Globe Importing Co. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 478

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 12, 1962

DocketNo. 66851; protests 60/4933, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 478 (Globe Importing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Globe Importing Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 478 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

[479]*479Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of aerators in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 339 (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 339), as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), for brass household utensils, not specially provided for, or at 13% or 12% percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, was sustained. The items marked “AA,” stipulated to consist of aerators the same as those the subject of Abstract 65882, except that they are in chief value of zinc, were held dutiable at 19 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, supra, for household utensils, not specially provided for, composed of other base metal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[479]*479Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of aerators in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 339 (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 339), as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), for brass household utensils, not specially provided for, or at 13% or 12% percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, was sustained. The items marked “AA,” stipulated to consist of aerators the same as those the subject of Abstract 65882, except that they are in chief value of zinc, were held dutiable at 19 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, supra, for household utensils, not specially provided for, composed of other base metal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Cust. Ct. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/globe-importing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack