Global Am. Ins. Managers v. Perera Co., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Global Am. Ins. Managers v. Perera Co., Inc.

364 A.2d 546, 144 N.J. Super. 24

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedSeptember 29, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 364 A.2d 546 (Global Am. Ins. Managers v. Perera Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Global Am. Ins. Managers v. Perera Co., Inc., 364 A.2d 546, 144 N.J. Super. 24 (N.J. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

144 N.J. Super. 24 (1976) 364 A.2d 546

GLOBAL AMERICAN INSURANCE MANAGERS, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PERERA COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION AND PERERADEAK & CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 21, 1976. Decided September 29, 1976.

Before Judges HALPERN, ALLCORN and BOTTER.

Mr. Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Apruzzese & McDermott, attorneys).

Mr. Morris R. Zucker argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Zucker, Lowenstein, Gurny, Facher & Zucker, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Antell in the Chancery Division, 137 N.J. Super. 377.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

144 N.J. Super. 24 (1976) 364 A.2d 546

GLOBAL AMERICAN INSURANCE MANAGERS, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PERERA COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION AND PERERADEAK & CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 21, 1976. Decided September 29, 1976.

Before Judges HALPERN, ALLCORN and BOTTER.

Mr. Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Apruzzese & McDermott, attorneys).

Mr. Morris R. Zucker argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Zucker, Lowenstein, Gurny, Facher & Zucker, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Antell in the Chancery Division, 137 N.J. Super. 377.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 A.2d 546, 144 N.J. Super. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/global-am-ins-managers-v-perera-co-inc-njsuperctappdiv-1976.

Opinion

GLOBAL AMERICAN INSURANCE MANAGERS, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PERERA COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION AND PERERADEAK & CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

GLOBAL AMERICAN INSURANCE MANAGERS, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PERERA COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION AND PERERADEAK & CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.