Glisson v. McGehee

66 S.E. 494, 7 Ga. App. 150, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 565
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 10, 1909·No. 1968·Published

Opinion

Hni, O. J.

1. There was no usury in the note sued on, under the facts and the law as construed by the Supreme Court in Merck v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co., 79 Ga. 213 (7 S. E. 265), Sanders v. Nicolson, 101 Ga. 739 (28 S. E. 976), Gannon v. Scottish American Mortgage Co., 106 Ga. 510 (32 S. E. 591), and McCall v. Herring, 118 Ga. 522 ( 45 S. E. 422).

2. The charge of the court fully and correctly instructed the jury on the question of usury, and the exceptions to portions of the charge on that subject are without merit, when considered' with the entire charge.

3 No material error appears, and the evidence demanded the verdict rendered. ‘ Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glisson v. McGehee, 66 S.E. 494, 7 Ga. App. 150, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

66 S.E. 494 (Glisson v. McGehee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merck v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd.
7 S.E. 265 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)
Sanders v. Nicolson
28 S.E. 976 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Gannon v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.
32 S.E. 591 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
McCall v. Herrin
45 S.E. 442 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)