Glisson v. McGehee
This text of 66 S.E. 494 (Glisson v. McGehee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no usury in the note sued on, under the facts and the law as construed by the Supreme Court in Merck v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co., 79 Ga. 213 (7 S. E. 265), Sanders v. Nicolson, 101 Ga. 739 (28 S. E. 976), Gannon v. Scottish American Mortgage Co., 106 Ga. 510 (32 S. E. 591), and McCall v. Herring, 118 Ga. 522 ( 45 S. E. 422).
2. The charge of the court fully and correctly instructed the jury on the question of usury, and the exceptions to portions of the charge on that subject are without merit, when considered' with the entire charge.
3 No material error appears, and the evidence demanded the verdict rendered. ‘ Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E. 494, 7 Ga. App. 150, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glisson-v-mcgehee-gactapp-1909.