Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance

18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1935
DocketNo 4666
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606 (Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance, 18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606 (Ohio Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

[607]*607OPINION

By ROSS, J.

The plaintiff in error received full consideration for the premiums paid and now sought to be recovered, and cannot reclaim the agreed consideration for the insurance effective during the period to which such premiums and insurance applied.

This case is very similar to the case of McSwain v Washington Fidelity National Ins. Co., No. 4645, Hamilton County, decided by this court December 24, 1934.

The court committed no error in instructing a verdict for the defendant • and the judgment is affirmed.

HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. Business Men's Assurance Co.
11 N.E.2d 203 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glisson-v-columbus-mutual-life-insurance-ohioctapp-1935.