Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606 (Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[607]*607OPINION
The plaintiff in error received full consideration for the premiums paid and now sought to be recovered, and cannot reclaim the agreed consideration for the insurance effective during the period to which such premiums and insurance applied.
This case is very similar to the case of McSwain v Washington Fidelity National Ins. Co., No. 4645, Hamilton County, decided by this court December 24, 1934.
The court committed no error in instructing a verdict for the defendant • and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glisson-v-columbus-mutual-life-insurance-ohioctapp-1935.