Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance

18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1935·No. No 4666·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[607] OPINION

By ROSS, J.

The plaintiff in error received full consideration for the premiums paid and now sought to be recovered, and cannot reclaim the agreed consideration for the insurance effective during the period to which such premiums and insurance applied.

This case is very similar to the case of McSwain v Washington Fidelity National Ins. Co., No. 4645, Hamilton County, decided by this court December 24, 1934.

The court committed no error in instructing a verdict for the defendant • and the judgment is affirmed.

HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[607] OPINION

By ROSS, J.

The plaintiff in error received full consideration for the premiums paid and now sought to be recovered, and cannot reclaim the agreed consideration for the insurance effective during the period to which such premiums and insurance applied.

This case is very similar to the case of McSwain v Washington Fidelity National Ins. Co., No. 4645, Hamilton County, decided by this court December 24, 1934.

The court committed no error in instructing a verdict for the defendant • and the judgment is affirmed.

HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.

Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance, 18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606 (Ohio Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

18 Ohio Law. Abs. 606 (Glisson v. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related