Glisman v. Moses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glisman v. Moses

246 A.D. 635

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order denying application [636]*636for a peremptory order of mandamus modified so as to direct the issuance of an alternative mandamus order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that there are questions of fact presented for determination. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that there is no proof of the existence of any other position to which the petitioner would be legally entitled to be transferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying application [636]*636for a peremptory order of mandamus modified so as to direct the issuance of an alternative mandamus order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that there are questions of fact presented for determination. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that there is no proof of the existence of any other position to which the petitioner would be legally entitled to be transferred.

Glisman v. Moses, 246 A.D. 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 635 (Glisman v. Moses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.