Glisman v. Moses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glisman v. Moses

246 A.D. 635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 635 (Glisman v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glisman v. Moses, 246 A.D. 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying application [636]*636for a peremptory order of mandamus modified so as to direct the issuance of an alternative mandamus order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that there are questions of fact presented for determination. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that there is no proof of the existence of any other position to which the petitioner would be legally entitled to be transferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying application [636]*636for a peremptory order of mandamus modified so as to direct the issuance of an alternative mandamus order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that there are questions of fact presented for determination. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that there is no proof of the existence of any other position to which the petitioner would be legally entitled to be transferred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glisman-v-moses-nyappdiv-1935.