Glinsky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
171 A. 794, 112 N.J.L. 501, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 301
This text of 171 A. 794 (Glinsky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glinsky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 171 A. 794, 112 N.J.L. 501, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 301 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 A. 794, 112 N.J.L. 501, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glinsky-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nj-1934.