Glinski v. Lomenzo

24 A.D.2d 655, 261 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3681
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 7, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 655 (Glinski v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glinski v. Lomenzo, 24 A.D.2d 655, 261 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We consider that we are bound, and that our decision must be controlled, by the order of the three-Judge District Court [656]*656granted May 24, 1965, in WMCA v. Lomenzo (238 F. Supp. 916) subsequent to the decision of Matter of Orans (15 N Y 2d 339), which order was followed by the denial of a stay by the Supreme Court of the United States (Travia v. Lomenzo, 381 U. S. 431). Judgment and order modified, on the law and the facts, so as to reverse and dismiss the first cause of action, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Application by respondents-appellants for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals from our affirmance of the dismissal of the second and third causes of action granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ince v. Rockefeller
290 F. Supp. 878 (S.D. New York, 1968)
WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo
246 F. Supp. 953 (S.D. New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 655, 261 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glinski-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1965.