Glinski v. Lomenzo
This text of 24 A.D.2d 655 (Glinski v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We consider that we are bound, and that our decision must be controlled, by the order of the three-Judge District Court [656]*656granted May 24, 1965, in WMCA v. Lomenzo (238 F. Supp. 916) subsequent to the decision of Matter of Orans (15 N Y 2d 339), which order was followed by the denial of a stay by the Supreme Court of the United States (Travia v. Lomenzo, 381 U. S. 431). Judgment and order modified, on the law and the facts, so as to reverse and dismiss the first cause of action, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Application by respondents-appellants for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals from our affirmance of the dismissal of the second and third causes of action granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 655, 261 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glinski-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1965.